Flux Paints and Pastes – Part 2


Part: 1: Flux Paints and Pastes – Part 1

Flux and Braze Paste Characteristics

The purpose of flux and/or braze pastes is to provide an initial or supplemental volume of flux and/or filler metal in the form of a viscous liquid at or near the interface of two components:

  • Folded tube seams
  • Tube to header joints
  • Connector tube to manifolds
  • End caps
  • Blocks and fittings
  • Flame braze joints


Flux and braze pastes exhibit pseudoplastic viscosity, meaning to have shear thinning behavior. As the shear stress is increased, the viscosity decreases, but the relationship is not linear. When the shear stress decreases, the viscosity increases, again non-linearly. Other factors affecting viscosity are solids content and temperature. Generally speaking, as the temperature increases, the viscosity decreases. Conversely, as the solids content increases, the viscosity also increases. These dependences illustrate the importance of quoting the parameters under which the viscosity is measured.

The graph below shows the effect of temperature on viscosity:


Note that at each temperature, a double curve is shown representing two sets of measurements: one curve shows the decrease in viscosity as the shear rate is increased and the other curve shows the increase in viscosity as the shear rate is decreased. This mirrored behavior as the shear rate is increased or decreased perfectly illustrates the pseudoplastic behavior.

The following curves show both: – the effect of temperature, and – solids content on viscosity:

These properties allow a bead of flux paste to be dispensed on the surface of a folded tube consistently and continuously at line speeds ranging from 30 m/min to 120 m/min.

Influence of Carrier on Volatilization Behavior

Since the carrier is a main ingredient, the carrier burn off temperature must be considered.

Below are 3 TGA curves showing burn-off temperature of 3 different paste formulations:

Glycol based carrier

Glycol based carrier – burn off at 180°C @ 10°C/min


Acrylate based carrier

Acrylate based carrier – burn off at 400°C @ 10°C/min

Polybutene based carrier

Polybutene based carrier – burn off at 425°C @ 10°C/min


Delivery Systems and Recommendations

When designing a flux delivery system, choosing the right delivery pump is just as important. Below is a list of pros and cons for the associated pumps.

Diaphragm Pump

  • Low cost, low maintenance
  • High flow
  • Generally used for low viscosity fluids
  • Pulsation, viscosity sensitive
  • Poor flow metering

Air Over Liquid (Pressure Vessel)

  • Low cost, low maintenance
  • Temperature sensitive
  • Viscosity sensitive
  • Poor flow metering

Rotary/Gear Pump

  • High viscous liquids
  • Metered dosing
  • Pulsation
  • Does not handle solids

Rotor-Stator Pumps

  • High viscous liquids
  • No pulsation
  • Precision metering
  • Not viscosity sensitive
  • Highest cost

Rotor-stator pumps are the pumps of choice because of their ability to deliver a constant volume of material without pulsation over a range of flow rates. The best example of this is in the localized dispensing of a continuous bead/stripe in folded tube mills where speeds can range from 20 m/min to 120 m/min.

In lower demanding applications where precision dispensing and flow control is not so critical, for example in tube to header fluxing, the lower cost options (air over liquid, diaphragm pumps) are more than adequate.

2 Kommentare
  1. Stuart Reed
    Stuart Reed sagte:

    Good day,

    I am very interested in finding out more about the closed loop system of fluxing components.

    We currently have a Sagir flux machine which is a constant headache and very inefficient with flux usage.

    I have had little success finding a manufacturer of the machine you feature a diagram of in the posts on this website, I wonder if you could point me in the direction of a manufacturer or a photo of a closed loop machine?

    kind regards,


  2. Hans Swidersky
    Hans Swidersky sagte:

    Hello Stuart,

    Thank you very much for your enquiry on the Aluminium Brazing Blog about equipment suitable for Paint Flux application.

    I understand your question about „a closed loop machine“ as an option for re-usage of overspray. It is our experience that recycling is not really an option for paint spraying. There is a high risk of deteriorating the formulation by partial polymerisation – resulting in the formation of polyurethane agglomerates and potential blockage of the spray nozzles. In addition, the recycle material will contain – and gradually accumulate – contamination from the part surfaces (e.g. dirt, dust, metal fines). It is not possible to remove such particles efficiently; and they are another root cause for clogging.

    Overspray in paint fluxing is a concern of many users – a lot of effort is therefore dedicated to the improvement of spray pattern and yield. Recent design modifications of paint machines offer improved performance characteristics and self-cleaning features. The objective is to minimise overspray as much as possible.

    I am currently not aware of any ‚closed loop system‘ in operation for large scale production volume.

    Best regards
    Hans Swidersky


Hinterlasse einen Kommentar

An der Diskussion beteiligen?
Hinterlasse uns deinen Kommentar!

Schreibe einen Kommentar

Deine E-Mail-Adresse wird nicht veröffentlicht.