The general appearance of NOCOLOK® brazed parts can range from relatively bright to light grey depending on the flux loading and furnace dew-point. When either is increased excessively over recommended levels, the appearance moves towards the grey colour. The flux residue usually can not be seen by the naked eye, however, it is visible under a microscope at 50x magnification. Higher magnification SEM views of the flux residue are shown in the pictures below.

SEM photomicrographs of NOCOLOK flux residue

SEM photomicrographs of NOCOLOK flux residue

The pictures on the left are typical of a tunnel furnace brazed surface, needle-like in structure possibly including the odd flat platelet. The pictures identified M-70323 are typical of a furnace atmosphere containing higher than recommended levels of O2 specifically during the cooling cycle in a batch furnace. The morphology is almost 100% flat platelets. This surface has been reported to have better corrosion resistance in service.

Other flux residue properties are as follows:

a) Residue Thickness

Typically 1–2 microns. This can vary depending on flux coating weight prior to brazing.

b) Hardness

The residue hardness is about 4 on the Mohs scale.

c) Adhesion

No measurable loss has been found in circulation tests with freon or glycol type coolants using recommended flux loading. However there are reports that some detachment may occur where higher than recommended flux loading is used, particularly where molten flux pooled in downside areas.

d) Wettability

The post-braze flux residue has a hydrophilic (wetting) surface, however that wettability decreases with time.

e) Corrosion Resistance

The presence of flux residue on the part surface mildly increases corrosion resistance under normal conditions.

f) Solubility

Solubility of flux residue is influenced by the method of measurement. A typical value are between 1.2 and 3.0 g/l with Al, F and K ion concentrations approaching the stoichiometry of the compound KAlF4 .

g) Post-Braze Odour

There is a slight odour from minute amounts of H2S immediately after brazing. It disappears within a short time. If objectionable, the odour may be eliminated by rinsing the part with water.

h) Post-Treatment

The flux residue provides a good base for coatings. However, thicker residues resulting from higher than recommended flux loading can result in the poor or non-adhesion of wet or dry powder paint coatings.

NOCOLOK® Flux residue is not easily removed from the surface of brazed parts. Mechanical abrasion, such as wire brushing or grit blasting, can be used to clean off heavier flux residues from “robust” joints. No practical chemical cleaning solution has been found. Boric acid and nitric acid solutions at higher temperature will partually remove the residues, however the times required (~ 1 hour) and the dangerous fuming with nitric acid preclude their use. Basically, the best procedure is to flux the product properly so that there is no visible after-braze residues and therefore no flux removal required.

2 replies
  1. Aad Wittebrood
    Aad Wittebrood says:

    I thought the needles in M 69604 were formed due to the reaction of the flux and magnesium from the alloy.

    Reply
  2. Hans Swidersky
    Hans Swidersky says:

    Yes, the needles visible in SEM pictures of flux residue consist of Mg-F and K-Mg-F compounds. Please see below some additional SEM pictures with Mg, F, and K element scans (source: A. Gray, Alcan, Influence of Residual Flux Level on the Corrosion Behavior of CAB Alloys, AFC Holcroft Seminar, October 2001) – and typical XRDs from flux residue (source: Solvay Fluor, R&D Department)

    SEM image
    SEM_image
    Magnesium
    Magnesium
    Fluorine
    Fluorine
    Potassium
    Potassium
    XRD of Post Braze Flux Residue
    XRD of Post Braze Flux Residue

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Want to join the discussion?
Feel free to contribute!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *